I was quoted in the Swindon Advertiser today. It would have been nice if they actually quoted, even partially, what I wrote, or even called to speak with me.
My full comments can be seen published on the public planning portal: https://pa1.swindon.gov.uk/publicacc…/applicationDetails.do…
“I write in reference to planning app S/LDP/19/1756 35 Voyager Drive.
I would like to register the following comments.
Voyager Drive and Apollo Close have limited parking.
Voyager Drive itself is a main through road to other parts of Oakhurst. Parking on this road is not easy and causes issues for passing traffic.
Apollo Close is a narrow and short cul-de-sac. It provides access to a few Voyager Drive residents parking and garages, along with Apollo Close residents.
Having spoken with the residents their plan is to create 2/3 parking spaces in the indicated area on their property, in order to reduce the need for the family to have to park on Voyager Drive or Apollo Close. This will compliment the 2 existing parking spaces the resident has, and make more space available road side to other neighboring residents.
The resident will try to keep some of the more mature green foliage along 2 sides of the area. This is important as we are losing too much green space to development.
I have spoken with some residents in the area and the general view is it will help the parking situation.
I do have the following questions:
Is a dropped curb required to correctly designate this as an off road parking? This could be important in future if there were enforcement action required due to access being blocked.
I would like to see some of the green space retained. I appreciate this is not public land, but when built it was designated as green space on their plot. Can a condition be placed that a percentage of the land remains green space?
I would like to see access to the parking spaces be located so it has minimal impact on others who may need to park road side.
I have attached an image with my thoughts on how best to implement, with minimal impact on other residents, whilst maintaining some green space.
Overall I am in support of the application and see no reason why we should not grant a certificate, provided it meets planning requirements.”